The project area is situated in the northwest region of Bosnia and Herzegovina, within the administrative boundaries of Republika Srpska. This area encompasses five local self-governments: Banja Luka, Prijedor, Kozarska Dubica, Gradiška, and Laktaši. The total area of the region amounts to 3722.3 km², which represents 15.1% of the territory of Republika Srpska, or 7.27% of the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The observed area exhibits a pronounced physical geographical diversity, reflected in various relief, geological, pedological, hydrological, climatic, and vegetation characteristics of the space itself. Flat terrains cover 42% of the territory, hilly terrains cover 43% of the territory, while mountainous areas account for approximately 15% of the region's territory. The hydrographic network is very rich, and the entire area belongs to the basins of the rivers Una, Sana, Vrbas, Vrbanja, and the immediate basin of the river Sava.
Additionally, this area is abundant in sources of drinking water, which are mainly located in the hilly and mountainous parts, while in the flat part, aquifers with good reserves of groundwater are present. Deciduous and mixed forests are the most prevalent, while coniferous forests are considerably less present in the observed area. It is estimated that the forested area covers around 37% of the total territory, not including areas covered by shrub vegetation. It is estimated that by mid-2022, there were 360,926 inhabitants in the observed area, representing 32.22% of the population of Republika Srpska, or 10.74% of the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina. More than 60% of the population lives in urban areas. Observing the gender structure of the population, it can be concluded that the female population is more prevalent in the region (51.6%).
In terms of the age structure of the population, the working-age population is the most prevalent (67.7%), followed by the elderly population, which accounts for 18.4%. The young population is the least represented, contributing only 13.9% to the total age structure. It should be emphasized that the observed region has been experiencing a depopulation process for several decades, especially in rural areas. Positive natural population growth is only recorded in some urban centers (such as Banja Luka, Prijedor, Laktaši). Population migrations mainly involve internal movements from rural areas to urban centers, as well as external migrations towards neighboring countries and EU countries.
No. | Title | Unit of measure | Quantity | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | Land area by type: a. mountain; b. forest; c. hilly; d. plain; e. water-covered (by type: lake, river,…) | km2 | a. 514; b. 1366,1; c. 1596; d. 1593,5; e. 31,1 | CORINE land cover 2018; NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) |
1.2 | Topographic diversity (geographic form and elevation variation) | % | Plain area 42,8%; Hilly area 42,9%; Mountain area 14,3%. | NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) |
1.3 | Population on 1 January by age group, sex and NUTS 3 or equivalent | n. | Total population 360926; Male 48,4%; Female 51,6%; Age group 0-14: 13,9%; Age group 15-64: 67,7%; Age group 65+: 18,4% | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
1.4 | Population: Structure indicators by NUTS 3 or equivalent region | n. | D.D. | |
1.5 | Population density | n./sq. km | 96,9 | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
1.6 | Municipalities | n. | 5 | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
1.7 | Population in urban areas/total | % | 61,8% | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
1.8 | Rural centers | n. | Total number of rural settlements – 269; Total number of major rural settlements - 39 | epublika Srpska Institute of Statistics and Republic Authority for Geodetic Affairs – RS |
In the past, there have been numerous initiatives for collaboration and connecting the spatially functional unit of 9 municipalities that gravitate around the mountain of Kozara, but none have materialized. There is a particular need for cooperation and connecting local communities, especially in the tourism sector and the creation of a unique tourist destination with a strong cultural identity that has been evolving for centuries. In the area, various organizations, institutions, companies, and individuals operate at different levels, directly or indirectly linked to cultural, natural heritage, and tourism. The area encompasses the economic, cultural, political, financial, and university center of Republika Srpska (one of the two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina), as well as the regional center of Prijedor, which hosts the headquarters of numerous institutions, NGOs, and businesses. Additionally, the area includes four cities and one municipality.
Some of the key stakeholders are the relevant ministries in the Republic of Srpska Government, municipal and city administrations departments, and tourist organizations, folklore clubs, cultural centers, as well as individuals knowledgeable about local stories, legends, and anecdotes. Local government units, together with the tourist organizations of cities and municipalities, have a good understanding of local conditions and possess certain knowledge related to the cultural and natural heritage of their municipalities. State institutions and centers coordinate activities related to legislation, strategic planning, education, research, and investments in the protection and valorization of resources.
Private companies such as tourist agencies and tour operators, hospitality businesses, and transporters have a direct interest in the valorization of tourist resources and their utilization for economic purposes. Citizen associations such as folklore clubs, women's associations, or national minorities have solid bases related to cultural heritage, and the project can provide them with new insights generated through meetings and field research. Individuals, enthusiasts who have gained certain knowledge and information related to cultural heritage through their work and experience, are also significant. Additionally, NGOs dealing with culture and environmental protection significantly influence local conditions through event organization, information dissemination, advocacy, promotion, and protection of the natural and cultural values of the area. Good practice examples of synergy among stakeholders in the area are rare, thus the Mystical Danube project presents an excellent opportunity for everyone to come together and connect through a new storytelling route of intangible cultural heritage, which will unite stakeholders of the area and create a joint tourism product.
2.6 | Government | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.7 | (Tourism) Business Sector | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.8 | Educational Sector | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.9 | Transport Sector | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.10 | NGOs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.11 | Local communities / minorities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Economic activities of the region are concentrated in several sectors. Previously, this region was known for a strong industrial sector related to basic industry, wood processing, mining, food, and textile industries, as well as part of the defense industry. Today, industrial production is at a much lower level compared to the 1990s. Additionally, due to favourable natural conditions, agricultural production (crop farming, fruit growing, livestock farming) is developed in this region, especially in Lijevče Field, Dubica Plain, and Prijedor Field. In other parts of the region, agricultural production has a somewhat more extensive character. Forestry is prevalent in areas rich in forests, primarily in the wider regions of Kozara, Prosara, Majdanska Mountains, and the southern part of Banja Luka. The most dominant sector in the economy of the observed area is the tertiary sector. Here, the influence of trade and related activities is particularly emphasized. Additionally, catering and related services has a significant share in the economy of most municipalities, while manufacturing and service crafts are much less represented. Tourism still has modest indicators in the overall economy of the region. There has been a slight growth in the areas of transportation and construction.
When it comes to the labour market, there are certain limitations. In smaller municipalities (Kozarska Dubica, Laktaši, Gradiška), there is a shortage of job opportunities in the real sector, resulting in relatively high unemployment rates. The average unemployment rate in the region, according to official data, is around 24%. However, considering the shortcomings in the methodology of data collection for this indicator, there is a possibility that this rate is actually lower. It is important to note that recently there has been a shortage of qualified workforce, as well as certain highly educated profiles. The cause of the labour shortage is economic migration towards neighbouring countries and EU countries.
Although there are no exact data on trade and exports at the local/regional level, it can be said that there is a smaller number of business entities that are export-oriented, with the main market being countries in the region and some EU countries. Also, data on the number of startups are not available, but based on data from business reports, it can be concluded that this number is not large and that the majority of startups are in the IT or technology sector.
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Gross domestic product (GDP) | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Employment (thousand persons) | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Dispersion of regional employment rates | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Dispersion of regional unemployment rates | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Business demography by size class | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
Most of the tourist sites and characteristics of local life are connected to the mountain of Kozara, which is surrounded by 9 municipalities, 5 of which are included in the project analysis. The most recognizable feature is the Kozara National Park, within which lies the memorial zone of the epic battle of World War II, featuring the sculpture by Dušan Džamonja and a museum.
There are numerous other markers, stories, and legends related to World War II which are still not valorized. Additionally, within the national park area, there are several hospitality facilities and kilometers of well-maintained hiking and biking trails that allow visitors to explore the mountain and its rich biodiversity. Most of these trails are located on Mount Kozara and are properly marked with signage. The trails are mainly used by day-trippers, hikers, and residents of surrounding municipalities, with insignificant visitors and tourists. There are very few maintained and marked hiking and biking trails outside the National Park, and efforts should be made to expand this network to connect tourist sites and stories. The regional road R477 passes through the center of the National Park, connecting the municipal centers of Gradiska and Prijedor over Mount Kozara, serving as the main road link to the Kozara National Park. There is a need to connect the Kozara National Park with the center of the Dubica municipality, enabling the development of circular tours from Banja Luka to the National Park, Dubica, Prijedor, and back to Banja Luka. Unfortunately, there is no public transport linking the municipal centers to the Kozara National Park, resulting in very poor accessibility to the region's main tourist attraction.
Apart from the National Park, other significant locations of interest and tourist sites within the project area include Laktasi spa center, the Mostanica Monastery, the memorial zone "Donja Gradina," and the Eco Center Ljekarice, while many other tourist potentials are underutilized. Particularly significant resources and potentials are found in the rural areas with strong cultural heritage, hospitable residents, and rural farms and households. There are also significant archaeological sites from various periods (from prehistory to the present) that place this area among the richest in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Accommodation facilities in the project area are mainly concentrated in municipal centers, with small accommodations in villages being very poorly represented. Each local government unit in the project area has a Local Tourist Boards with operating information centers. At the heart of the Kozara National Park is the Visitor Center and museum, where visitors can learn about the historical, cultural, and natural characteristics of the mountain of Kozara. Additional protected areas are designated in the spatial plan of the area, which could become significant destination points.
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Number of establishments and bed-places | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
NUTS 3 name or equivalent regions name | Nights spent in tourist accommodation | Sources/Links | Notes/Remarks |
---|
No. | Title | Unit of measure | Quantity | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
3.2.3 | Area of regenerated open spaces and regenerated public buildings (last 10 years) | sq. m. | D.D. | |
3.2.4 | Tourist visits (year) and other information of tourist value | n. | 154555 | Republic of Srpska Institute of statistics |
3.2.5 | Duration of the period favorable to green mobility | n. of months / year | 1. April - 31. October | D.D. |
3.2.6 | Tourist who go hiking | n/year | D.D. | |
3.2.7 | Other activities tourists carry out while staying in the region (by type and %) | % | Spa Treatments; Cycling; Ethno animations; Farm tourism; Religious tours; Fly Fishing; Bird Watching; Gastro tours | No official source, by experience |
The transportation position of the region is very favourable, and it can be said to be a sort of crossroads connecting different parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina with the continental part of Croatia, further extending into the spatial central Europe. Considering the transportation position, the transportation infrastructure is relatively well-developed. The most developed and dominant type of transportation is road traffic. The network of primary transportation arteries spans across all sectors of the region, with the densest concentration found within the municipalities of Banja Luka, Laktaši, and Gradiška. Notably, these municipalities host a constructed highway, strategically serving to interconnect this segment of Bosnia and Herzegovina with the broader national network and the Republic of Croatia. Also, railway transport is present in the region, mainly serving for the transportation of goods and less frequently for passenger traffic. The railway line passes through the municipalities of Prijedor and Banja Luka.
The concept of green mobility has been promoted only in the last few years and is mainly focused on urban centers. The leader in terms of green mobility is certainly the city of Banja Luka. Banja Luka has developed a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan, and activities have already begun to reduce motorized traffic in the city center and promote non-motorized modes of transportation. In addition to Banja Luka, Prijedor and Gradiška are considering activities related to promoting e-mobility. In Banja Luka, hybrid taxi vehicles have been introduced as a pilot project, and electric-powered buses for public transportation are also being considered.
Bicycle traffic is present in all municipalities; however, due to the lack of exact data, the exact number of users cannot be determined with certainty. The bicycle infrastructure is most developed in Banja Luka, where intensive efforts have been made in recent years to build new bicycle lanes and bike parking facilities. Other municipalities are following this trend but to a much lesser extent. Unfortunately, there are still no inter-municipal bicycle paths.
For all municipalities, it can be said that public urban and suburban transportation is underdeveloped. Banja Luka, as the largest city, has established public urban and suburban transportation, but with significant shortcomings. The prices of public transportation are high, so citizens often opt for alternative modes of transportation (e.g., private cars). The concept of intermodality is still in development, and there are no systematic efforts towards integrating multiple modes of transportation systems.
No. | Title | Unit of measure | Quantity | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
4.1 | Transport infrastructure (by type and length) | km | Highway – 49 km; Main roads – 312 km; Regional roads – 245 km; Local roads – 1357 km | Spatial planning documentation; Local self-government |
4.2 | Existing trails (type, length, conditions, …) | km | D.D. | |
4.3 | Transport-related accidents (by mode of transport, other characteristics) | n. (per year) | 4917 | Ministry of the Interior, Republic of Srpska |
4.4 | Percentage of population riding a bike | % | D.D. | |
4.5 | Railroad infrastructure | km | 143,3 | Spatial planning documentation |
Public water supply systems exist in all municipalities of the region. Currently, 99,736 households, or 77.5% of households in the region, are connected to the water supply system. On the other hand, other households are connected to local rural water supply systems that are not part of the public water supply system, while a small portion of households, mostly in individual and remote parts of the region, use water from their own wells. Only 50,004 households, or 38.8% of households in the region, are connected to the wastewater drainage system. Sewerage systems are built in urban centers of municipalities but do not cover the entire territory of urban areas. In rural areas, sewerage systems are rarely present or non-existent. No municipality has a wastewater treatment plant with primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment built, so municipal wastewater is discharged directly into the receptors. A smaller portion of industrial plants discharges wastewater into receptors after primary and secondary treatment, while an undetermined number of industrial and manufacturing facilities discharge their wastewater without any treatment. As a result of such activities, there is a lower quality class of watercourses downstream from urban centers. Solid waste collection is carried out at the regional landfill located near Banja Luka. A solid waste collection system has been established in all municipal centers. Solid waste is also organizedly collected in some rural settlements. However, the majority of rural settlements, especially those remote, do not have an organized solid waste collection system, leading to occurrences of various-sized illegal dumpsites. The insufficiently strict legal framework and the limited capacity of inspection services are also limiting factors when it comes to environmental protection. The distribution of electrical energy is organized through one distribution company that covers the entire region. The electrical energy consumed in the region comes from hydroelectric sources as well as from a coal-fired power plant. The contribution of solar and wind energy to the overall energy balance is almost non-existent. Unfortunately, data on both consumers and electricity consumption are not available at the local level, but reports from the distribution company indicate that there are certain energy losses in the grid due to the obsolescence of certain distribution lines. Due to underdeveloped legislation in the field of renewable energy and a lack of investment, significant projects related to renewable energy have not been recorded in the observed region.
Climate change is already present in the observed region and has an impact on all sectors, with a particular emphasis on agriculture, forestry, and water management. The analyses so far have shown an increase in average air temperatures, and this trend is expected to continue in the future. Over the last two decades, there has been an increase in the frequency of heatwaves and temperature extremes. The overall annual amount of precipitation has not varied significantly, but there has been a change in seasonal distribution. Spring precipitation extremes causing floods are becoming more frequent, while periods of drought are becoming more common in summers.
No. | Title | Unit of measure | Quantity | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
5.1.1 | Water supply | N. of households | 99736 | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
5.1.2 | Energy supply (last year) | n. | D.D. | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
5.1.3 | Maximum, minimum and mean temperature (Average) | C. | Average year minimum: 5°C; Average year: 9,8 °C; Average year maximum: 10,9 °C | Republic Hydrometeorological Institute; Climate atlas of Bosnia and Herzegovina. |
5.1.4 | Variation of exceptional climatic adverse events against previous year | n. | D.D. | |
5.1.5 | Sewage connections | N. of households | 50004 | Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics |
5.1.6 | Maximum, minimum and mean precipitation (by year) | mm | Average year minimum – 917 mm; Average year – 1001 mm; Average year maximum – 1172 mm | Republic Hydrometeorological Institute; Climate atlas of Bosnia and Herzegovina. |
A variety of geological, pedological, morphological, hydrographic, climatic, vegetative, and other conditions have led to the existence of a large number of valuable sites and areas throughout the region. Some of the mentioned sites and areas have been recognized by relevant institutions and, as such, have been formally protected. Currently, there are seven protected areas with various levels of protection according to the IUCN in the region. The highest level of protection in the region is enjoyed by the Kozara National Park, which is territorially the largest protected area. What is interesting about the Kozara National Park is that, in addition to its natural heritage, it also contains significant elements of cultural heritage. Positioned at the center of the region, Kozara undoubtedly leaves its mark on the wider surroundings. The other categories of protected areas include nature monuments, nature parks, forest parks, and resource management areas.
However, in the region, there are other valuable natural areas that, in terms of their characteristics and values, are not inferior to formally protected areas. The Spatial Plan of the Republic of Srpska, as well as the spatial plans of local self-government units, have identified areas and sites that, due to their specific characteristics, should be formally protected in the future. A total of 13 such areas have been identified, which are very diverse in terms of types (ranging from caves, nature parks, forest parks, natural landscapes, special ornithological reserves, and similar). What characterizes most of the existing and planned protected natural areas is the intertwining of elements of cultural heritage, which ultimately adds additional quality to such sites.
During field visits and targeted interviews, as well as interactive workshops as part of project activities, it was determined that in the observed area, there are still many sites and areas with exceptional natural values that are not well-known and have not been adequately presented in the media so far. All the mentioned areas need further exploration and promotion in order to be adequately valorized.
No. | Name | Location | Condition | Protection level | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.2.1 | Kozara | Prijedor, Gradiška, Kozarska Dubica | D.D. | National park, II category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.2 | Pećina Ljubačevo | Banja Luka | D.D. | Natural monument, III category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.3 | Lijevčanski knez | Gradiška | D.D. | Natural monument, III category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.4 | Una | Kozarska Dubica | D.D. | Nature park, V category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.5 | Slatina | Laktaši | D.D. | Forest park, VI category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.6 | Jelića Brdo | Laktaši | D.D. | Forest park, VI category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.7 | Univerzitetski grad | Banja Luka | D.D. | Resource management area, VI category IUCN | Protected |
5.2.8 | Prosara | Kozarska Dubica, Gradiška | D.D. | Nature park | Planned for protection |
5.2.9 | Sana donji tok | Prijedor | D.D. | Nature park | Planned for protection |
5.2.10 | Banja Laktaši complex | Laktaši | D.D. | Nature park | Planned for protection |
5.2.11 | Trapisti | Banja Luka | D.D. | Forest park | Planned for protection |
5.2.12 | Starčevica | Banja Luka | D.D. | Nature park | Planned for protection |
5.2.13 | Šibovi sa Suturlijom | Banja Luka | D.D. | Forest park | Planned for protection |
5.2.14 | Kanjon Vrbasa | Banja Luka | D.D. | Protected natural landscape | Planned for protection |
5.2.15 | Krupa na Vrbasu | Banja Luka | D.D. | Natural park | Planned for protection |
5.2.16 | Osmača-Tisovac-Čemernica | Banja Luka | D.D. | Nature park | Planned for protection |
5.2.17 | Bardača-Donja Dolina | Gradiška | D.D. | Protected cultural landscape | Planned for protection |
5.2.18 | Saničani | Prijedor | D.D. | Special ornithological nature reserve | Planned for protection |
5.2.19 | Pećina u Trnovcu-Savino Brdo | Gradiška | D.D. | Natural monument | Planned for protection |
The socio-cultural environment of a region is shaped by its historical background, societal norms, traditions, and interactions among various social groups. In the case of the project area, a historical description reveals a complex tapestry of socio-cultural dynamics that have evolved over time.
Initially, the region might have been characterized by indigenous communities living in harmony with nature, practicing traditional customs, and engaging in subsistence activities. As external influences began to shape the landscape, such as migrations, invasions, and trade routes, the socio-cultural fabric underwent significant transformations. For example, the arrival of different ethnic or religious groups could have led to cultural exchanges, conflicts, or assimilation processes, impacting the social cohesion and identity of the local population.
Colonialism, imperialism, or feudal systems might have introduced hierarchical structures, power dynamics, and socio-economic disparities, influencing the distribution of resources, land ownership, and access to education or political representation. Additionally, technological advancements, urbanization, and industrialization could have altered traditional livelihoods, social roles, and community structures, leading to the emergence of new social classes, urban-rural divides, and cultural hybridization.
Over time, political ideologies, revolutions, or wars might have further shaped the socio-cultural landscape, fostering solidarity, resistance movements, or ideological divisions within the society. The establishment of nation-states, borders, and administrative systems could have also affected cultural identities, language policies, and inter-ethnic relations, sometimes leading to tensions or conflicts.
No. | Name | Location | Condition | Protection level | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.1.1 | The Memorial Complex “Kozara” on Mrakovica | Kozara mountin | Good | Cultural and historical monument | |
6.1.2 | Gornji Bakinci – Late Antique-Early Byzantine city and three Early Christian basilicas | Laktaši | Medium | List of national monuments | |
6.1.3 | The wooden church in Malo Blaško | Laktaši | Medium | List of national monuments | |
6.1.4 | Italian church in village Mahovljani | Laktaši | Good | Temporary List of National Monuments | |
6.1.5 | The remains of the early-Byzantine lost city of Balkis | Laktaši | Good | List of national monuments | |
6.1.6 | The archeological site “Brdašce” | Laktaši | Good | Locally protected | |
6.1.7 | The wooden church in Marićka | Prijedor | Good | List of national monuments | |
6.1.8 | The wooden church in Rakelići | Prijedor | Good | Temporary List of National Monuments | |
6.1.9 | The wooden church in Busnovi | Prijedor | Good | Temporary List of National Monuments | |
6.1.10 | The wooden church in Omarska | Prijedor | Good | Locally protected | |
6.1.11 | The Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Kozarac | Prijedor | Good | Temporary List of National Monuments | |
6.1.12 | The Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary known as Mehmed’s church | Prijedor | Good | Locally protected | |
6.1.13 | The Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in Šurkovac | Prijedor | Good | Temporary List of National Monuments | |
6.1.14 | The Klisina Monastery | Prijedor | Good | Temporary List of National Monuments | |
6.1.15 | Monastery Moštanica | Kozarska Dubica | Good | Cultural and historical monument | |
6.1.16 | Excavations of the Đurđevac Monastery | Kozarska Dubica | Medium | Locally protected | |
6.1.17 | The first partisan airport | Kozarska Dubica | Medium | Locally protected | |
6.1.18 | Donja Gradina Memorial | Kozarska Dubica | Medium | Cultural and historical monument | |
6.1.19 | The necropolis of stećak tombstones in Moconje | Banja Luka | Good | List of national monuments | |
6.1.20 | The wooden church in Kola | Banja Luka | Good | List of national monuments |
6.2.1 | Oral traditions and expressions including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.2 | Performing arts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.3 | Social practices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.4 | Rituals and festive events | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.5 | Knowledge and practice about nature and the universe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.6 | Traditional craftsmanship | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The socio-cultural environment of a region is shaped by its historical background, societal norms, traditions, and interactions among various social groups. In the case of the project area, a historical description reveals a complex tapestry of socio-cultural dynamics that have evolved over time.
Initially, the region might have been characterized by indigenous communities living in harmony with nature, practicing traditional customs, and engaging in subsistence activities. As external influences began to shape the landscape, such as migrations, invasions, and trade routes, the socio-cultural fabric underwent significant transformations. For example, the arrival of different ethnic or religious groups could have led to cultural exchanges, conflicts, or assimilation processes, impacting the social cohesion and identity of the local population.
Colonialism, imperialism, or feudal systems might have introduced hierarchical structures, power dynamics, and socio-economic disparities, influencing the distribution of resources, land ownership, and access to education or political representation. Additionally, technological advancements, urbanization, and industrialization could have altered traditional livelihoods, social roles, and community structures, leading to the emergence of new social classes, urban-rural divides, and cultural hybridization.
Over time, political ideologies, revolutions, or wars might have further shaped the socio-cultural landscape, fostering solidarity, resistance movements, or ideological divisions within the society. The establishment of nation-states, borders, and administrative systems could have also affected cultural identities, language policies, and inter-ethnic relations, sometimes leading to tensions or conflicts.
No.: 7.1.1 Title: Culture Development Strategy of Republika Srpska Author: Government of Republic of Srpska Period: 2023-2030 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.2 Title: Law on Culture Author: National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska Period: From July 17, 2018 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.3 Title: The Law about Cultural goods Author: National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska Period: From February, 2022 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.4 Title: Low on Tourism Author: National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska Period: From February, 2023 Remarks: Official Gazette of the Republic of Srpska |
No.: 7.1.5 Title: Hospitality Law Author: National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska Period: From May, 2017 Remarks: Official Gazette of the Republic of Srpska |
No.: 7.1.6 Title: Tourism Development Strategy Author: Government of Republic of Srpska Period: 2021-2027 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.7 Title: Banja Luka City Development Strategy Author: City Assembly Period: 2018-2027 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.8 Title: Gradiska City Development Strategy Author: City Assembly Period: 2019-2027 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.9 Title: Laktasi City Development Strategy Author: City Assembly Period: 2014-2024 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.10 Title: Kozarska Dubica Municipal Development Strategy Author: Municipal Assembly Period: 2022-2028 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.11 Title: Prijedor Integral Development Strategy Author: City Assembly Period: 2014-2024 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.12 Title: Banja Luka Culture Development Strategy Author: City Assembly Period: 2018-2028 Remarks: |
No.: 7.1.13 Title: Law on Museum Activities of the Republic of Srpska Author: National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska Period: Remarks: |
No.: 7.2.1 Title: Kozara ethno Implementer: Banja Luka Tourist Board Period: 2005 - Remarks: kozaraethno.com |
No.: 7.2.2 Title: Feel Kozara Explore Implementer: Development Agency of the City of Prijedor Period: 2021 - 2023 Remarks: Supported by EU4BusinessRecovery program |
No.: 7.2.3 Title: Preparation/Updation of Protected Area Management Plans that Integrate Climate Change Adaptation Measures Implementer: Faculty of Sciences, University of Banja Luka Period: 1st April 2023 – 30. April 2024 Remarks: UNDP Business partner |
No.: 7.2.4 Title: Project of Municipal, Environmental and Economic Management (MEG) Implementer: City of Gradiska and UNDP Period: 2021-2025 Remarks: Supported by the Government of Switzerland |
No.: 7.2.5 Title: Collection and Treatment of waste water Gradiška Implementer: City of Gradiska Period: 2021-2026 Remarks: The German Development Bank (KfW) as a financing agency - with funds from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), and the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). |
No.: 7.2.6 Title: Establishing a Sustainable Water Supply System in Gradiška Implementer: City of Gradiska Period: June 2023 – Novembar 2024 Remarks: The Government of the Republic of Slovenia through the Center for International Cooperation and Development (CMSR). |
No.: 7.2.7 Title: Strengthening the Role of Local Communities / Local Communities (MZ) in Bosnia and Herzegovina Implementer: City of Gradiska and UNDP Period: March 2020 – February 2024. Remarks: Government of Switzerland and Government of Sweden |
No.: 7.2.8 Title: Three-string tambourine Implementer: Folklore club Piskavica Period: April 29 - August 31, 2024 Remarks: Suporrted by City of Banja Luka |
No.: 7.2.9 Title: Rural - Challenges of Depopulation and Innovative Approaches in Rural Areas of the Danube region Implementer: Development Agency of the City of Prijedor Period: Remarks: Interreg Danube Region |
No.: 7.2.10 Title: Natural and cultural heritage - identity codes of the past, present and future Implementer: University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics Period: December 2023 – December 2024 Remarks: The Ministry of Scientific and Technological Development and Higher Education |
No.: 7.2.11 Title: Preparation/updating of management plans for protected areas that integrate climate change adaptation measures Implementer: University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics Period: April 2023 – April 2024 Remarks: United Nations Development Programme - UNDP |